From: <rwicks@dodo.com.au>
Subject: Re: Shunning tricks. Was: Thanks, Rod
Date: Thursday, August 24, 2006 10:16 AM


Viv wrote:
> But the basic question remains unanswered:
> How does Fred define a "Baha'i fundamentalist",

Viv.......
Fred has answered your question by refering you to the 'Baha'i
Technique'
I have answered your question by refering you to the 'Baha'i
Technique'
Ron has answered your question by refering you to the 'Baha'i
Technique'

Do you think it might be possible that the answer you seek resides in
the 'Baha'i Technique'?

I have even gone so far as offering you live action evidence of the
'Baha'i Technique'
in action.....right now....on Beliefnet....Channel 'Baha'i Debate'.

You "shun" and reject that evidence, option. and answer.


>  We seem to have a number of cases where the definisiton he
> emplys is "anyone who disagrees with Fred".

I'm willing to have a look at the "cases" you refer to.
Are you willing to have a look at the 'Baha'i Technique' in action?

But I have to ask from the outset....why would it be of
interest/important
to establish if Fred has "fundamentalist" tendencies (and what could
we/should we
do about it if we determine he does).....as opposed to the vital
consideration
of the very real and very observable 'Baha'i Technique'.....which
something could
and should be done about.

?

Rod
 